| Simulador de robo |
|---|
|
Probabilidades:
0% –
0% –
0%
más
|
| Derivado de |
|---|
| Ninguno. Éste es un mazo hecho de cero. |
| Inspiración para |
|---|
| Ninguno todavía. |
SirLargeness 470
So, there's probably many different pros and cons for the 9 other NW cards included, and those comments are totally welcome. The reason for the share though is to find out if the loss of fealty is too great a hit to make playing with Craven profitable outside a normal Winterfell stark fealty.
Let me know your thoughts, my small amount of testing with it have given me the anecdotal evidence that Craven is fucking bananas, but could be glass half full thought process.
I went 2 Calling cause i figured we'd still want the opportunity to choose more often than not on initiative, as Shadow Tower greatly favors us if we go second. Its a pretty great card in conjunction with the stopping power of Stark guys.
First of all I would like to say I love the deck idea, As soon I saw it I knew it was something I wanting to give a spin. Craven is indeed bonkers good.
While I did win with the deck I felt the plots needed some tweaking. I found the opening turn to be awkward in the scenario you are limited on economy. No plot in the deck allows you to drop an Ed, Rob, or Blackfish unless you draw economy. Even if you hit your rose road or heart tree you can have issues casting those card plus a much needed milk or craven. Even keeping a Nightmares back up is nice. I generally like to open with an economy card or 7+ when I feel I am behind on board and lacking econ. Noble, or trading may need to be a one of. I think turns 2-3. I like the idea of going 2 with Calling though.
I also find myself at a point mid game when I wanted to drop winter fell and a Jon, but unable to due to economy.
My suggestions: