Simulador de robo |
---|
Probabilidades:
0% –
0% –
0%
más
|
Derivado de |
---|
Ninguno. Éste es un mazo hecho de cero. |
Inspiración para |
---|
Ninguno todavía. |
Lawyer 426
I've played Greensight with Greyjoy since the release of the agenda now i'm going for The Wars To Come for a tool box plot deck but i will continue to keep this deck updated.
Greyjoy have an annoying KW: Pillage. Focusing excessively the deck on char with this KW it's too much then here the best balanced solution in my opinion and experience playing with.
Why playing Greensight?
- Have you ever complained about your top deck?
- Have you ever complained about opponent's top deck?
- Do you want to put your opponent in trouble more effectively with Tris Botley and Euron Crow's Eye?
- Do you want to have information on the cards on the top deck of your opponent?
- Control the Draw Phase
Then give a try to this agenda. The deck has a setting to strongly control the locations, you have only to be careful about opponent's Valar Dohaeris then play dupes on big char only if you are sure to can do it and don't fear the intrgigue claim, put out Nagga's Ribs fast as you can if you have Aeron Damphair (Core) what is dead may never die!
feel free to ask anything. Cheers
2 comentarios |
---|
|
In a meta dominated by Flea Bottom have more solution as you can to limit it, is a good call. In conclusion, i had not any problem by having an heavy location setting. if you did not like NML you can replace them with one more The Reader and Theon to mill you opponent's deck if you gave both on the field |
Is it necessary to have such heavy location control (3x Shipwrights, 2x Lords, 2x Raiders, 2x WdnS as well as Nothing Burns in the plot deck)? What do you do against decks with minimal and/or only limited locations? I particularly dislike the Lords because if the opponent doesn't have a non-limited locations, it's essentially a 4 cost monocon with no effect i.e. terrible, particularly in the icon removal meta that the Martell box introduced.